Independent dating in archaeological analysis
The new radiocarbon dates push back by 2 centuries the accepted IA chronology of Edom.Data from Khirbat en-Nahas, and the nearby site of Rujm Hamra Ifdan, demonstrate the centrality of industrial-scale metal production during those centuries traditionally linked closely to political events in Edom's 10th century BCE neighbor ancient Israel.The cornerstone of our unique approach to project delivery and risk management is our highly skilled team.We have an ongoing commitment to ensure that more than 50% of our team are senior consultants and specialists with extensive experience and a demonstrated ability to provide resolution of complex heritage management issues and minimise our clients' risks.Archaeology as a field is distinct from the discipline of palaeontology, the study of fossil remains.To reiterate, archaeologists do not dig dinosaurs, and tend to find this misconception rather disheartening.The archaeological record consists of artifacts, architecture, biofacts or ecofacts, and cultural landscapes.
AHMS is set apart by our commitment to quality heritage management, investment in our people and close engagement with our clients to understand their needs, manage their risks and provide positive heritage outcomes.
Our commitment to senior expertise is unmatched in the heritage consulting industry and ensures we bring consistent high quality to all our projects.
We have specialists in archaeological analysis, excavation and conservation advice, community consultation, strategic planning and cultural values mapping.
Archaeologists such as Glueck metaphorically carried the trowel in 1 hand and the Bible in the other, searching the archaeological landscape of the southern Levant for confirmation of the biblical narrative from the Patriarchs to the United Monarchy under David and Solomon to other personages, places, and events mentioned in the sacred text.
Beginning in the 1980s, this paradigm came under severe attack, primarily by so-called biblical minimalist scholars who argued that as the HB was edited in its final form during the 5th century (c.) BC (3), any reference in the text to events earlier than 500 BC were false (4).
A controlled analysis and comparison of tree-ring sample collection activity, correspondence, unpublished research records, and the publication record relevant to North American archaeological tree-ring dating from 1914 to 1945 provides a chronicle of important events in the development of archaeological dendrochronology, provides an understanding of the processes through which tree-ring dating became incorporated in increasingly sophisticated archaeological analyses and interpretations of Southwestern and indeed North American prehistory, serves as a case study for a proposed unilineal model of the development and incorporation of analytical techniques in archaeology, and lays the foundation for a body of theory regarding the development of ancillary chronometric and archaeometric techniques and their application to archaeological problems.